Turn recurring quality issues into fixes that stick.
A recurring problem becomes a case with an owner, a fix and a check on the next lot that it held.
Lot 3 shrinks after washing: 31 per 1,000 against 2.3 in lots 1 and 2.
- Evidence
- 21 of 24 complaints came from lot 3
- Likely cause
- A substitute thread that shrinks more than the canvas
- Confirmed by
- Quality lead, after a lab wash test
- Fix
- Switch back to the approved thread. File thread changes before use
- Check
- Watch lot 4 against 2.3 per 1,000
The case file quality works from, with the evidence and the cause on one page.
Sound familiar?
- The same complaint comes back every season.
- Quality feedback stops at the service desk.
- A fix is agreed in a meeting and nobody checks that it held.
A problem nobody owns keeps costing returns and reviews, and the next lot repeats it.
What changes.
- Ownership
- Support closes the ticketA case with an owner in development, sourcing or quality
- Cause
- Guessed from a few complaintsConfirmed by the people qualified to confirm it
- The fix
- Agreed in a meetingA tracked change to the product, supplier, packaging or instructions
- Proof
- AssumedThe next lot checked against the same rate
How it works. 7 steps, 4 stages.
- AI1
- Rules and automation3
- Your team3
- Approval
1Open
Rules and automation
Open a case at the line
A lot or revision that crosses the rate your team sets opens a case with its evidence attached.
2Investigate
AI
Assemble the history
Sample reports, test results, supplier changes and complaints for that lot, on one page.
Your teamApproval
Confirm the cause
Quality or engineering decides what caused it. A serious safety signal goes straight to your escalation path.
3Fix
Your team
Choose the fix
Development, sourcing or customer service takes the change, whether product, supplier, packaging or instructions.
Rules and automation
Track the owner and the date
Open actions age on one board, and the factory confirms each change in writing.
- Outlook
4Verify
Rules and automation
Watch the next lot
Complaints per 1,000 for the next lot, against the lot that failed.
- Gorgias
- Shopify
Your teamApproval
Close or reopen the case
Quality closes it once the next lot holds.
Lessons join the library and the checklist
What you get. Real work, every week.
- Switch lot 4 to the approved threadFactory · confirmed in writingLot 4In production
- File thread changes before useSourcing · substitution requestNew ruleAgreed
- Add a wash and shrink check to lot approvalQuality · every lotEach lotPlanned
Every action with an owner and a state, so a fix can’t quietly stall.
| Lot | Thread | Per 1,000 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lot 1 | Approved | 1.5 | Below the line |
| Lot 2 | Approved | 3.0 | Below the line |
| Lot 3 | Substitute | 31 | Case opened |
| Lot 4 | Approved | — | Watching |
The check after the fix: the next lot against the lots before it.
How you’ll know it’s working.
Days from an opened case to a confirmed cause
How long a known problem waits before anyone can act on it.
Repeat defects after a fix
The test of whether a fix stuck.
Margin after returns on the affected product
The result finance cares about, read with price and season in view.
Baselines agreed before we build.
Works with what you have.
Support
- Gorgias
Commerce
- Shopify
- NetSuite
PLM & specs
- FlexPLM
- Centric PLM
- Arena
- We configure first
- Your PLM may already hold change and quality records. We use them and connect each case to the complaints that opened it.
- We build when
- A problem can be named, but nobody owns the fix and nothing checks that it held.
What a first build includes.
Built in your accounts, around your team. Scope, fee and baseline agreed before we start.
- 1Design
- 2Build
- 3Run it, or hand it over
We build
- A case opened from a defect-rate threshold
- A case file with the evidence and history attached
- An action ledger with owners and dates
- A check on the next lot against the one that failed
We start from
- Complaint cohorts by revision and lot
- Test results and supplier records
- Your escalation and closure rules
From your team
- Owner
- Quality lead
- Involves
- Quality
- Development
- Sourcing
- Customer service
- Factory partner
Questions teams ask.
Does this replace our quality system?
No. If you have one, the cases belong there and we feed it. If you don’t, we start with a light case file and an action ledger.
What about a safety issue?
A serious safety signal doesn’t wait for a trend. It follows your existing escalation path immediately, and the case file is opened beside it.
Who owns it once it’s running?
You do. It’s built in your accounts, documented, with training for the people who run it. Ownership usually sits with your quality lead. We can keep running it with you, or step back.
How do we start?
Usually with a development review: two to four weeks, a fixed fee credited to the build, and a plan that’s yours. If the job is already clear, we can scope the build directly.
Part of your development engine. One of 12 use cases, in 5 parts.
See the whole development engineIn quality loop
- Complaint cohortsTie every complaint to the revision and lot that shipped
- Corrective actionYou’re here
Works with
See it at work
Close the loop on every recurring defect. Start with a development review.
We reply within one business day.