Turn fit comments into the next revision.
Every fit comment checked against tolerance and tied to one revision, with a proposed fix your patternmaker approves.
| Point of measure | Target (cm) | Measured | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Half chest | 54.0 ±0.5 | 55.2 | 0.7 over limit |
| Body length | 72.0 ±0.7 | 72.3 | Within |
| Sleeve length | 65.0 ±0.7 | 64.8 | Within |
| Shoulder width | 46.0 ±0.5 | 46.2 | Within |
Half chest is 1.2 cm over target and 0.7 cm beyond the limit
The measurement check on every sample. Anything beyond tolerance is flagged against its revision.
Sound familiar?
- Round three, and the same comment keeps coming back.
- Fit notes arrive as photos, emails and a call you weren’t on.
- Nobody can say whether a sample is out of tolerance or just not what someone pictured.
Each extra fit round costs a sample, freight and the calendar time to wait for the next one.
What changes.
- Comments
- Photos, emails and meeting notesOne list, tied to the revision and size
- Checking
- Eyeballed against the last sampleMeasured against target and tolerance
- The fix
- Described in a callA proposed revision with the points it changes
- Repeats
- The same comment, round after roundPast fixes found before the next pattern change
How it works. 5 steps, 4 stages.
- AI2
- Rules and automation2
- Your team1
- Approval
1Collect
AI
Read the fit comments
Photos, notes and measurement sheets grouped by garment point and size.
2Measure
Rules and automation
Check against tolerance
Each point compared with its target and limit for that revision.
- Techpacker
- FlexPLM
3Propose
AI
Propose the next revision
Likely causes ranked, with similar fixes from earlier styles.
4Approve
Your teamApproval
Approve or change the revision
The patternmaker decides. Nothing is approved automatically.
Rules and automation
Number it and tell the factory
The approved revision gets an id and goes to the factory in place of the old one.
Accepted fixes join the block library
What you get. Real work, every week.
Take 1.2 cm out of the half chest.
- Why
- S02 half chest 55.2 against 54.0 ±0.5
- Likely causes
- Pattern, seam allowance, wash state, measuring method
- Similar fix
- A chest adjustment on an earlier field-jacket block
- Status
- Proposed. Waiting for the patternmaker
The proposed fix, with the likely causes. The patternmaker approves, edits or declines it.
How you’ll know it’s working.
Sample rounds to acceptance
Counted per style, against the same acceptance criteria every time.
Days from fit comment to approved revision
How long a comment waits between the fit session and a decision.
Fit comments that come back
A repeat comment means the last fix didn’t hold.
Baselines agreed before we build.
Works with what you have.
PLM & specs
- Techpacker
- FlexPLM
- Centric PLM
3D sampling
- CLO
- Browzwear
- We configure first
- Your tech-pack tool or PLM already holds the measurements. If you use CLO or Browzwear, we read from them and your pattern files stay where they are.
- We build when
- Fit comments and measurements sit in different places, and the same fix gets rediscovered.
What a first build includes.
Built in your accounts, around your team. Scope, fee and baseline agreed before we start.
- 1Design
- 2Build
- 3Run it, or hand it over
We build
- A fit-comment log tied to revision, size and point of measure
- Tolerance checks on every measured sample
- Proposed revisions for your patternmaker to approve
- A history of fixes by block and fabric
We start from
- Tech packs with tolerances and grade rules
- Past fit notes and measurement sheets
- Patternmaker and factory contacts
From your team
- Owner
- Technical designer or development lead
- Involves
- Technical design
- Patternmaking
- Factory partner
- Quality
Questions teams ask.
Does it change our patterns?
No. It proposes a revision and the points it would change. The patternmaker approves or edits it, and the pattern files stay in your own system.
Do we need 3D simulation for this?
No. It works from measured samples. If you already use a 3D tool, it can feed the same checks.
Who owns it once it’s running?
You do. It’s built in your accounts, documented, with training for the people who run it. Ownership usually sits with your technical designer or development lead. We can keep running it with you, or step back.
How do we start?
Usually with a development review: two to four weeks, a fixed fee credited to the build, and a plan that’s yours. If the job is already clear, we can scope the build directly.
Part of your development engine. One of 12 use cases, in 5 parts.
See the whole development engineIn specs & samples
Stop fixing the same fit twice. Start with a development review.
We reply within one business day.