[Product development & quality]() / [Use cases]() / [Fit revisions]() [How it works]() [What you get]() [Scope]() [Start a review]() [Product development & quality]()[Specs & samples]() # Turn fit comments into the next revision. Every fit comment checked against tolerance and tied to one revision, with a proposed fix your patternmaker approves. [Start with a development review]() [How it works]() Sample S02 · size M · revision D Week 3 Point of measure Target (cm) Measured Result Half chest 54.0 ±0.5 55.2 0.7 over limit Body length 72.0 ±0.7 72.3 Within Sleeve length 65.0 ±0.7 64.8 Within Shoulder width 46.0 ±0.5 46.2 Within Half chest is 1.2 cm over target and 0.7 cm beyond the limit The measurement check on every sample. Anything beyond tolerance is flagged against its revision. ## Sound familiar? - Round three, and the same comment keeps coming back. - Fit notes arrive as photos, emails and a call you weren’t on. - Nobody can say whether a sample is out of tolerance or just not what someone pictured. Each extra fit round costs a sample, freight and the calendar time to wait for the next one. ## What changes. ShowTodayWith the engine Comments Photos, emails and meeting notes One list, tied to the revision and size Checking Eyeballed against the last sample Measured against target and tolerance The fix Described in a call A proposed revision with the points it changes Repeats The same comment, round after round Past fixes found before the next pattern change ## How it works. 5 steps, 4 stages. - AI**2** - Rules and automation**2** - Your team**1** - Approval 1. 1 Collect 1. AI ### Read the fit comments Photos, notes and measurement sheets grouped by garment point and size. 2. 2 Measure 1. Rules and automation ### Check against tolerance Each point compared with its target and limit for that revision. - Techpacker - FlexPLM 3. 3 Propose 1. AI ### Propose the next revision Likely causes ranked, with similar fixes from earlier styles. 4. 4 Approve 1. Your team Approval ### Approve or change the revision The patternmaker decides. Nothing is approved automatically. 2. Rules and automation ### Number it and tell the factory The approved revision gets an id and goes to the factory in place of the old one. Accepted fixes join the block library ## What you get. Real work, every week. Revision E · proposed For the patternmaker Take 1.2 cm out of the half chest. Why S02 half chest 55.2 against 54.0 ±0.5 Likely causes Pattern, seam allowance, wash state, measuring method Similar fix A chest adjustment on an earlier field-jacket block Status Proposed. Waiting for the patternmaker The proposed fix, with the likely causes. The patternmaker approves, edits or declines it. ## How you’ll know it’s working. 1. Sample rounds to acceptance Counted per style, against the same acceptance criteria every time. 2. Days from fit comment to approved revision How long a comment waits between the fit session and a decision. 3. Fit comments that come back A repeat comment means the last fix didn’t hold. Baselines agreed before we build. ## Works with what you have. PLM & specs - Techpacker - FlexPLM - Centric PLM 3D sampling - CLO - Browzwear We configure first Your tech-pack tool or PLM already holds the measurements. If you use CLO or Browzwear, we read from them and your pattern files stay where they are. We build when Fit comments and measurements sit in different places, and the same fix gets rediscovered. ## What a first build includes. Built in your accounts, around your team. Scope, fee and baseline agreed before we start. 1. 1 Design 2. 2 Build 3. 3 Run it, or hand it over [Start with a review]() [Scope this build]() ### We build - A fit-comment log tied to revision, size and point of measure - Tolerance checks on every measured sample - Proposed revisions for your patternmaker to approve - A history of fixes by block and fabric ### We start from - Tech packs with tolerances and grade rules - Past fit notes and measurement sheets - Patternmaker and factory contacts ### From your team Owner Technical designer or development lead Involves - Technical design - Patternmaking - Factory partner - Quality ## Questions teams ask. Does it change our patterns? No. It proposes a revision and the points it would change. The patternmaker approves or edits it, and the pattern files stay in your own system. Do we need 3D simulation for this? No. It works from measured samples. If you already use a 3D tool, it can feed the same checks. Who owns it once it’s running? You do. It’s built in your accounts, documented, with training for the people who run it. Ownership usually sits with your technical designer or development lead. We can keep running it with you, or step back. How do we start? Usually with a development review: two to four weeks, a fixed fee credited to the build, and a plan that’s yours. If the job is already clear, we can scope the build directly. ## Part of your development engine. One of 12 use cases, in 5 parts. [See the whole development engine]() 1. [Briefs **1**]() 2. [Specs & samples **4**]() 3. [Suppliers & changes **3**]() 4. [Release **2**]() 5. [Quality loop **2**]() In specs & samples - [**Development readiness**Keep samples, tests and production readiness moving]() - **Fit revisions**You’re here - [**Sample policy**Decide which styles need a physical sample]() - [**Block library**Reuse approved blocks, materials and past fixes]() See it at work - [**In the canvas jacket’s twelve weeks**Week 3: sample S02 came back 1.2 cm too big]() ## Stop fixing the same fit twice. Start with a development review. [Start with a development review]() [**Talk it through first**15 minutes]() We reply within one business day. --- Source: [https://www.thekeating.co/use-cases/fit-revisions/]() [Contact Keating & Co](mailto:nelson@thekeating.co) · [Agent guidance](https://www.thekeating.co/llms.txt)